The December 09 Scientific American says that “ What distinguishes the true naysayers is an unwavering dedication to denying the need for action on the problem, often with weak and long-disproved arguments about supposed weaknesses in the science behind global warming”. Scientific American offers a “partial list of the contrarian’s bad arguments”. Viscount Monckton takes this list apart and then states the real science behind skeptics thinking. It is tour de force by Lord Monckton and well worth reading. Click here to read Monckton’s report.